Introduction
Across Liberia’s evolving employment landscape, a quiet but growing tension exists between former employees and their previous employers-centered around one increasingly sensitive document: the employment reference letter.
To many job seekers, particularly those navigating careers in NGOs, government agencies, or multinational firms, a reference letter is more than a professional courtesy-it’s viewed as a right. Yet under current Liberian labor law, no such entitlement exists.
So where does that leave HR professionals and organizations? In a complex grey zone-balancing fairness, institutional risk, and public expectations. This article explores the legal, professional, and cultural dimensions of employment references in Liberia, and offers guidance for HR professionals navigating this challenging terrain.
1. What Does the Law Say?
Liberia’s Decent Work Act of 2015 governs employment practices nationwide. However, it does not require employers to provide reference letters to former employees. There are no penalties for withholding a reference, nor any legal recourse for individuals denied one.
What the law does emphasize, however, is the principle of fairness, non-discrimination, and the maintenance of accurate employment records. These values indirectly shape how references should be handled-encouraging professional discretion, but offering no mandate.
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Sethi Brothers Inc. v. Mr. Frederick Jenteh (2021) further reinforces this. While not directly related to reference letters, the case highlighted the importance of credible employment documentation and equitable treatment in disputes. It shows that employer practices may be scrutinized in light of reasonableness and professionalism.
2. Why Employees Expect References
In Liberia, it is common practice-especially in the public and development sectors-to request a reference as part of recruitment. Over time, this informal norm has solidified into an expectation. Many employees now view reference letters as a post-employment entitlement, regardless of how their tenure ended.
But this expectation clashes with organizational concerns. HR managers often find themselves pressured to issue references in cases where:
- The employee was under formal disciplinary action.
- Performance was below expectations.
- The separation was acrimonious or involved legal issues.
- Internal policy restricts issuing subjective evaluations.
This dynamic creates friction, and in some cases, leads to threats of reputational damage or legal retaliation from former staff.
3. How Other Countries Handle It
A look at global reference-checking practices offers valuable lessons:
| Country | Legal Obligation | Common Practice |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | None | Most employers issue basic factual letters (dates and job title) to avoid liability. |
| United States | None | Employment verification is standard. Detailed references avoided due to defamation risk. |
| South Africa | None | References are common but usually limited to HR-confirmed information. |
| Australia | None (with exceptions) | Requires consent. Often verbal, strictly factual, and handled with care. |
The global trend is clear: references are discretionary, not mandatory. Where given, they are fact-based and risk-managed.
4. What Should Employers in Liberia Do?
4.1 Create a Clear Reference Policy
Every organization should have a written policy stating:
- Who may issue references (usually HR).
- What kind of content is permitted.
- Circumstances where a reference may be declined.
4.2 Train and Protect HR Teams
Only authorized personnel should issue references. This avoids inconsistency and shields the organization from potential legal or reputational fallout.
4.3 Offer Neutral Confirmation Where Appropriate
When appropriate, a neutral, factual letter is often the safest route. It confirms employment dates and position without expressing subjective opinions.
Sample Language:
“This letter confirms that [Name] was employed at [Company] from [Start Date] to [End Date] in the position of [Title]. We wish them success in their future endeavors.”
4.4 Be Transparent During Exit
During exit interviews, HR should clearly explain whether a reference will be provided-and what it will include. Managing expectations early prevents future disputes.
5. A Role for HR Institutions
Professional bodies such as the Association of Liberia Human Resource Professionals (ALHRP) have an opportunity to:
- Develop national reference-checking guidelines.
- Educate HR practitioners and the public on best practices.
- Serve as mediators when disputes over references arise.
A unified national position would bring structure and clarity to this increasingly contested issue.
6. Conclusion
Employment references remain a powerful but misunderstood aspect of professional life in Liberia. While they are not a legal obligation, they are deeply valued-and often demanded. The challenge for employers is to navigate this terrain with ethical discretion, legal caution, and clear internal standards.
For Liberia’s HR community, now is the time to lead-not just in policy but in practice. By adopting transparent, consistent, and fair reference procedures, we can reduce tensions, support mobility, and elevate the professionalism of our labor market.
About the Author
Gurus HR Consultancy Group is a leading Liberian firm providing strategic HR solutions, employment compliance guidance, and workforce development support. We help institutions become more effective, competitive, and productive across public, private, and nonprofit sectors.
Leave a Comment